FWC Workload Bill: What Employers Need to Know

Written by Lily Barnett

Reviewed by Isabella Turner

Written by Lily Barnett

Reviewed by Isabella Turner

4 min read
Published: August 26, 2026
Legal Topics
Employment & Workplace Law
Page Content
Page Content

As the number of Fair Work Commission (FWC) applications continues to rise, new parliamentary reforms are set to reshape the management of workplace disputes and accelerate the timeframes within which employers may need to respond. The Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 6 July 2026, with key FWC process reforms taking effect from 7 July 2026. The reforms provide the FWC with greater flexibility to manage the increase in applications, particularly dismissal-related disputes.

Why was the Bill introduced?

The reforms were a response to the rising application volumes and growing pressure on the FWC’s workload, including an increase in applications prepared using Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Their purpose is to reduce procedural delay and allocate FWC resources more effectively. Measures include avoiding some separate jurisdictional hearings, delegating certificate powers to senior staff and, with the parties’ consent, deciding suitable matters on written material rather than through formal hearings.

For employers and employees, the practical effect is that some FWC matters may move more quickly, with fewer preliminary disputes and more options for early case management.

Key Changes

The key changes give the FWC more procedural flexibility to manage its caseload. They are particularly relevant to dismissal-related disputes, general protections applications, and regulated worker claims, where preliminary arguments can otherwise slow proceedings. These changes include:

  • Fewer Preliminary Hearings: The FWC will now have greater ability to progress certain general protections dismissal and unlawful termination disputes without first conducting a separate hearing about whether a dismissal occurred. This is intended to avoid early jurisdictional disputes becoming a standalone source of cost and delay.
  • More Decisions on Written Material: Where appropriate, the FWC may decide certain applications based on written material rather than requiring parties to attend a formal hearing or conference. This makes written submissions, contemporaneous records and supporting evidence more important from the outset.
  • Broader Dismissal Powers: The FWC’s ability to dismiss applications that are frivolous, vexatious or have no reasonable prospects of success is expanded, including in relation to unfair deactivation and unfair dismissal applications involving regulated workers.
  • Restrictions on Repeat Applicants: Where a person has previously brought applications that were dismissed as frivolous, vexatious or without reasonable prospects, the FWC may prevent that person from bringing further applications without permission.
  • Faster Issue of Certificates: The FWC will be able to delegate certain powers to senior FWC members, including issuing certificates in unresolved general protections which involve dismissal and unlawful termination disputes so that matters can proceed to arbitration or court more quickly.

For employers, some matters may move to conciliation, arbitration or court with fewer preliminary steps. Jurisdictional objections remain available, but employers should be prepared to address procedural issues and the merits earlier in the matter.

What does this mean for claims?

One of the most important changes concerns dismissal-related general protections disputes, where previously, jurisdictional objections could require the FWC to determine whether a dismissal had occurred before the matter could proceed to conciliation. This often-adds further delay and costs in the early stages of the process, which is contrary to the FWC’s objectives of being just, quick and cheap.

Under the new approach, the FWC will generally have more flexibility to progress a dispute where dismissal is alleged, rather than first requiring a separate threshold contest. Employers should therefore be prepared to engage with the substance of a claim earlier, even where they maintain a jurisdictional objection.

Other notable reforms

The FWC may also determine certain matters without a formal hearing, where it is appropriate and with the parties’ consent. This can reduce attendance requirements, however, makes clear written submissions and supporting evidence more important.

The reforms broaden the FWC’s ability to dismiss unfair deactivation and unfair dismissal applications that are frivolous, vexatious or have no reasonable prospects of success. They also permit restrictions on repeat applicants in specified circumstances, assisting to reduce the burden of repeated meritless proceedings.

These dismissal powers extend to unfair deactivation and unfair termination applications involving regulated workers in the gig economy, reflecting the FWC’s expanding role beyond traditional employment relationships.

The Act also streamlines the pathway for parties to an existing supported bargaining agreement to obtain a later supported bargaining authorisation where the earlier authorisation was made within the relevant timeframe.

For Commonwealth procurement, grants and contractual arrangements, the Commonwealth, may in certain circumstances, prefer employers whose employees are covered by enterprise agreements. The practical effect will depend on future policy settings.

Finally, the Act provides for a separate high-income threshold for regulated road transport contractors. This is intended to improve access to FWC protections for some contractors whose high operating costs may otherwise affect their eligibility.

Key Takeaways for Employers

Proceedings may move faster, so employers should be prepared to respond promptly.

  • Organise evidence early. Keep reasons for termination, correspondence and supporting records clear and accessible.
  • Do not rely on jurisdictional objections. Raise any objection clearly but prepare to address the substance of the claim.
  • Review internal processes. Ensure termination, dispute-response and record-keeping procedures are current.
  • Seek advice early. Legal advice can help assess risk, preserve evidence and shape a strategic response.

We’re with you

At Chamberlains Law Firm, we help businesses navigate the complexities of termination, contractor agreements and workplace compliance. Our workplace lawyers can review your contracts, advise on termination risks and represent you in disputes. Whether you need updated templates, compliance advice or support managing a workplace dispute, our Workplace Law Team is here to help.

Get clear, strategic advice on Fair Work Commission disputes, dismissal claims and managing workplace risk, contact our Senior Associate Antonia Tahhan on 1300 676 823